Skip to content

Cart

Your cart is empty

Article: To Time Out or Not To Time Out

Disciplining Kids

To Time Out or Not To Time Out

We've been talking discipline in the house lately -- as Henry gets deeper into his toddler time, he's starting to test the waters in terms of what he is and is not allowed to do. Of course, kids this young have no impulse control, so it's foolish to expect them to not do something stupid. But it's doing it more than once that we're worried about -- or, more accurately, doing it after he's been told not to. The little punk's favorite technique now is, after he's been told not to touch something, to either: a) lean in extremely close and put his face millimeters away from the object in question, but not technically touching it, or b) find a handy object and touch the forbidden thing with it, all the while looking at me like the cat that ate the canary. So we're trying to figure out how to introduce discipline into his life. He has a basic knowledge of causality and one thing leading to another, but we're sort of torn on what to do after he does something that he knows is bad. The standard wisdom seems to be the ol' time out, but he just starts laughing whenever we put him in one. I was talking to my sister (who has three kids) and she says that she never uses the time outs -- instead, she tries to redirect their energy to something else. She says that she thinks that traditional discipline is too reactive, and she tries to be more proactive. We were also reading Your Baby and Child by Penelope Leach, which also pooh-poohs time outs, instead recommending that parents "time in," in a way, by holding the misbehaving child in a close hug until they calm down and act rationally. This seems sensible to me -- instead of punishing your child by ignoring them, you stay with them and make yourself more available -- but does it really work? If a kid is acting out to get attention, isn't this just rewarding that behavior? We haven't made a decision as to what we're going to do yet. I think we'll just take it as it comes, and do what feels right based on the offense. Whether that be time out, long hugs, or some as yet undetermined third option only time will tell. What works for you?

1 comment

Being a babysitter extraordinaire (but not a Mom quite yet), I have only my personal experience to look at in this matter, but I’ll lend my 2 cents anyways :)

I truly believe that Time Out was a valuable experience for me as a child. Not only did I learn to occupy myself and expand my imagination, I also feel like it socialized me to understand cooperation and positive participation leads to fulfilling social interaction (and the lack of such may lead to alienation).

In my work with elderly affected by Alzheimers, we use Diversion all the time. It diffuses frustration and resolves a lot of conflicts encountered by people who feel like they are fully capable of acting independently but in reality need assistance to ensure their safety. It is a different stage in life, certainly, but I think both tactics are appropriate for young children.

kitty

Leave a comment

This site is protected by hCaptcha and the hCaptcha Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

All comments are moderated before being published.

Read more

Baby Music

The Power of Music: Preemies Benefit from Listening to Tunes

A new study is providing compelling evidence that music can help premature infants to decrease their overall pain levels, increase oxygen saturation, and transition to a bottle.

Read more
Baby Music

Killer Queen: Reviews Coming in for Lullaby Renditions of Queen!

"Now What Baby" and "Post & Courier" weigh in on Rockabye Baby! Lullaby Renditions of Queen.

Read more